an article came out in PLOS the other week entitled: “gay genes” may be good for women
i’m wavering with this one. nature vs. nurture — ontogeny drives me a bit awry and i am one for genes as back-street drivers; hate the x-genes . . . i think i should have learned my lesson by now on attempting to corroborate sexuality/desire into evolutionary paradigms, but here i am again — thoughts? but in the end, salamati to whatever floats your boat . . .