nature versus nurture: eh, whatever works.

an article came out in PLOS the other week entitled: “gay genes” may be good for women

http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2008/618/1?etoc

i’m wavering with this one. nature vs. nurture — ontogeny drives me a bit awry and i am one for genes as back-street drivers; hate the x-genes . . . i think i should have learned my lesson by now on attempting to corroborate sexuality/desire into evolutionary paradigms, but here i am again — thoughts? but in the end, salamati to whatever floats your boat . . .


Advertisements
Previous Post
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: